Robotic hands, Passive mechanisms, Performance indicators, Application scenarios, Trade-off analysis
," /> Robotic hands, Passive mechanisms, Performance indicators, Application scenarios, Trade-off analysis
,"/> Robotic hands, Passive mechanisms, Performance indicators, Application scenarios, Trade-off analysis,"/> Passively Adaptive Robotic Hands: A Trade-off-driven Review of Core Mechanisms, Performance Indicators, and Application Scenarios

Quick Search Adv. Search

Journal of Bionic Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 2645-2672.doi: 10.1007/s42235-026-00972-0

    Next Articles

Passively Adaptive Robotic Hands: A Trade-off-driven Review of Core Mechanisms, Performance Indicators, and Application Scenarios

Tian Yang1,2,3; ShuYue Zhang1,2,3; Zheng Deng1,2,3; Hongliu Yu1,2,3; Qiaoling Meng1,2,3   

  1. 1 Institute of Intelligent Rehabilitation Engineering, Universityof Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
    2 Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Assistive Devices,Shanghai 200093, China 3 Key Laboratory of Neural Functional Information andRehabilitation Engineering of the Ministry of Civil Affairs,Shanghai 200093, China
  • Online:2026-10-15 Published:2026-10-27
  • Contact: Qiaoling Meng1,2,3 E-mail:qiaoling_meng@126.com
  • About author:Tian Yang1,2,3; ShuYue Zhang1,2,3; Zheng Deng1,2,3; Hongliu Yu1,2,3; Qiaoling Meng1,2,3

Abstract: Passively adaptive robotic hands have attracted growing attention because they shift part of the burden of grasp adaptation from sensing and control to mechanical design. However, existing reviews often discuss variable stiffness, underactuation, structural deformation, and related strategies separately, making it difficult to compare how different passive mechanisms balance adaptability, load capacity, grasp precision, and control simplicity. This paper provides a trade-off-driven and application-oriented review of passively adaptive robotic hands. The field is synthesized from a mechanism-performanceapplication perspective, covering four major categories: variable-stiffness mechanisms, underactuated coupling and transmission mechanisms, structural deformation mechanisms, and mode-switching and hybrid actuation strategies. These mechanisms are discussed in relation to key performance indicators, including shape adaptability, payload, positional tolerance, impact resistance, lightweight design, and reliability, as well as their relevance to representative scenarios such as daily object grasping, high-load manipulation, and clinical assistive applications. Rather than maximizing any single performance metric, passive adaptive mechanisms primarily contribute by redistributing competing design constraints through mechanical intelligence. Finally, this paper highlights current challenges, discusses limitations in cross-study performance comparison, and outlines promising directions for future research.

Key words: Robotic hands')">Robotic hands, Passive mechanisms, Performance indicators, Application scenarios, Trade-off analysis