Crash structures, Energy absorption, Honeycomb structure, Gradual fibre orientation, Fibre winding, Biomimetics
," /> Crash structures, Energy absorption, Honeycomb structure, Gradual fibre orientation, Fibre winding, Biomimetics
,"/> Crash structures, Energy absorption, Honeycomb structure, Gradual fibre orientation, Fibre winding, Biomimetics ,"/> Biomimetic Composite Structures with Fibre Angle Gradients: Enhancing Energy Absorption via Progressive Failure

Quick Search Adv. Search

Journal of Bionic Engineering ›› 2026, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 2389-2400.doi: 10.1007/s42235-026-00926-6

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Biomimetic Composite Structures with Fibre Angle Gradients: Enhancing Energy Absorption via Progressive Failure

Ole Middendorf1; Milan Kelch2; Jörg Müssig1   

  1. 1 The Biological Materials Group, Faculty 5/Biomimetics,HSB - City University of Applied Sciences, Neustadtswall30, 28199 Bremen, Bremen, Germany
    2 Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology andAdvanced Materials IFAM, Wiener Straße 12,28359 Bremen, Bremen, Germany
  • Online:2026-08-15 Published:2026-10-27
  • Contact: Jörg Müssig1 E-mail:jmuessig@bionik.hs-bremen.de
  • About author:Ole Middendorf1; Milan Kelch2; J?rg Müssig1

Abstract: As mobility, safety, and sustainability are increasingly important issues today, this work focuses on energy-absorbing structures with fibre-angle gradients along the specimen length. The aim is to create a gradient of material properties in a composite, leading to a significant increase in energy absorption properties due to a more efficient failure. The methodology is based on the biomimetic techno-pull principle, which led to the abstraction of the dactyl club of the Mantis shrimp (Odontodactylus scyllarus). The fibre angle gradient was realised with three different single-specimen winding patterns and a honeycomb structure, compared with 87° and 0° single-specimen winding patterns and a 0° honeycomb structure. All specimens were made of regenerated cellulose fibre in an epoxy resin matrix and tested under axial compression at a process speed of 1000 mm min?1. Comparing the two structures, the mass-specific energy absorption for the fibre angle gradient structure is significantly higher at 20.77 ±2.33 kJ kg?1 than for the 0° fibre angle structure at 4.98±0.99 kJ kg?1, due to progressive failure.

Key words: Crash structures')">Crash structures, Energy absorption, Honeycomb structure, Gradual fibre orientation, Fibre winding, Biomimetics