Biomimetic Composite Structural T-joints

doi:10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60130-3

Abstract

Abstract:

Biological structural fixed joints exhibit unique attributes, including highly optimized fiber paths which minimize stress concentrations. In addition, since the joints consist of continuous, uncut fiber architectures, the joints enable the organism to transport information and chemicals from one part of the body to the other. To the contrary, sections of man-made composite material structures are often joined using bolted or bonded joints, which involve low strength and high stress concentrations. These methods are also expensive to achieve. Additional functions such as fluid transport, electrical signal delivery, and thermal conductivity across the joints typically require parasitic tubes, wires, and attachment clips. By using the biomimetic methods, we seek to overcome the limitations which are present in the conventional methods.
In the present work, biomimetic co-cured composite sandwich T-joints were constructed using unidirectional glass fiber, epoxy resin, and structural foam. The joints were fabricated using the wet lay-up vacuum bag resin infusion method. Foam sandwich T-joints with multiple continuous fiber architectures and sandwich foam thickness were prepared. The designs were tested in quasi-static bending using a mechanical load frame. The significant weight savings using the biomimetic approaches is discussed, as well as a comparison of failure modes versus architecture is described.

Key words: composites, T-joints, biomimetic, fiberglass, epoxy, sandwich, foam

Vimal Kumar Thummalapalli, Steven L. Donaldson. Biomimetic Composite Structural T-joints[J].J4, 2012, 9(3): 377-384.

References

[1] Stickler P B. Investigation of mechanical behavior or traverse stitched T-joints with PR520 resin in flexure and tension. Composite Structures, 2001, 52, 307–314.

[2] Ferry D. Geometry and damage effects in a composite marine T-joint. Composite Structures, 2004, 66, 181–187.

[3] Shenoi R, Hawkins G. Influence of material and geometry variations on the behaviour of bonded tee connections in FRP ships. Composites, 1992, 23, 335–345.

[4] Burns L A. Tree joints: biomimetic insights for aerospace composite joints. Proceedings of the 27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Nice, France, 2010.

[5] Kumari S. Experimental and numerical analysis of transverse stitched T-joints in bending. Composite Structures, 2000, 50, 17–27.

[6] Stickler P B, Ramulu M, van West P B. Transverse stitched T-joints in bending with PR520 resin: initial results. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2001, 20, 65–75.

[7] Haq M. Health monitoring of composite Pi-joints using fiber optic sensors. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Technical Conference of the American Society for Composites, Dayton, USA, 2010.

[8] Li H C H, Herszberg I, Mouritz A P, Dharmawan F. Fracture modeling of composite marine T-joint. Australian and New Zealand Industrial and Applied Mathematics Journal, 2007, 47, 682–694.

[9] Sinha P K. Effects of transverse stitching and hydrothermal environment on composite wing T-joints. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2003, 22, 1705–1728.

[10] Mattheck C. Design in Nature: Learning from Trees, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 1998.

[11] Gutowska M, Melzner F, Pörtner H O, Meier S. Cuttlebone calcification increases during exposure to elevated seawater pCO2 in the cephalopod Sepia officinalis. Marine Biology, 2010, 157, 1653–1663.

[12] Kosters J, Donaldson S. Fiber architecture concepts from nature: literature review and comments. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Technical Conference of the American Society for Composites, Newark, Delaware, USA, 2009.

[13] Theotokoglou E, Torgeir M. Experimental and numerical study of composite T-joints. Journal of Composite Materials, 1996, 30, 190.

[14] Li J. Pull-off tests and analysis of composite skin and frame T-joint. American Society for Composites 17th Technical Conference, Seattle, USA, 2002.

[15] Groves A. Dynamic and Static Performance of Composite T-joints: European Union Collaboration for the Long-term. Project report RTP3.21

[16] Brunner A J. Comparison of Designs of CFRP-Sandwich T-Joints for Surface-Effect Ships Based on Acoustic Emission Analysis from Load Tests. Composite Structure: Theory and Practice, ASTM STP 1383.

[17] Haq M. Pull-out behavior of adhesively bonded composite pi-joints: damage modeling & comparison with experiments. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Technical Conference of the American Society for Composites, Dayton, USA, 2010.

[18] Diler E, Özes C, Ne?er G. Effect of T-joint geometry on the performance of a GRP/PVC sandwich system subjected to tension. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2009, 28, 49–58.

[19] Freels J K. Modeling fracture in Z-pinned composite co-cured laminates using smeared properties and cohesive element in DYNA3D. Thesis report Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, 2006.

Quick Search Adv. Search