Flow Visualization of Rhinoceros Beetle (Trypoxylus dichotomus) in Free Flight

doi:10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60127-3

Abstract

Abstract:

Aerodynamic characteristics of the beetle, Trypoxylus dichotomus, which has a pair of elytra (forewings) and flexible hind wings, are investigated. Visualization experiments were conducted for various flight conditions of a beetle, Trypoxylus dichotomus: free, tethered, hovering, forward and climbing flights. Leading edge, trailing edge and tip vortices on both wings were observed clearly. The leading edge vortex was stable and remained on the top surface of the elytron for a wide interval during the downstroke of free forward flight. Hence, the elytron may have a considerable role in lift force generation of the beetle. In addition, we reveal a suction phenomenon between the gaps of the hind wing and the elytron in upstroke that may improve the positive lift force on the hind wing. We also found the reverse clap-fling mechanism of the T. dichotomus beetle in hovering flight. The hind wings touch together at the beginning of the upstroke. The vortex generation, shedding and interaction give a better understanding of the detailed aerodynamic mechanism of beetle flight.

Key words: beetle, smoke wire visualization, free flight, hovering flight, wing interaction, elytron effect

Tien Van Truong, Tuyen Quang Le, Hieu Trung Tran, Hoon Cheol Park, Kwang Joon Yo. Flow Visualization of Rhinoceros Beetle (Trypoxylus dichotomus) in Free Flight[J].J4, 2012, 9(3): 304-314.

References

[1] Dickinson M. Insect flight. Current Biology, 2006, 16, R309–R314.

[2] Dudley R. The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2002.

[3] Dickinson M H, Lehmann F-O, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 1999, 284, 1954–1960.

[4] Birch J M, Dickinson M H. Spanwise flow and the attachment of the leading-edge vortex on insect wings. Nature, 2001, 412,729–733.

[5] Srygley R B, Thomas A L R. Unconventional lift-generating mechanisms in free-flying butterflies. Nature, 2002, 420, 660–664.

[6] Kim W K, Ko J H, Park H C, Byun D Y. Numerical study on the effects of corrugation of the gliding dragonfly wing. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2009, 260, 523–530.

[7] Le T Q, Byun D Y, Saputra, Ko J H, Park H C, Kim M. Numerical investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of a hovering Coleopteran insect. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2009, 266, 485–495.

[8] Wood R J. The first takeoff of a biologically inspired at-scale robotic insect. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2008, 24, 341–347.

[9] Lee Y, Yoo Y, Kim J, Widhiarini S, Park B, Park H C, Yoon K J, Byun D Y. Mimicking a superhydrophobic insect wing by argon and oxygen ion beam treatment on polytetrafluoroethylene film. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2009, 6, 365–370.

[10] Nguyen Q V, Park H C, Goo N S, Byun D Y. Characteristics of a beetle's free flight and a flapping-wing system that mimics beetle flight. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, 77–86.

[11] Ellington C P, van den Berg C, Willmott A P, Thomas A L R. Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 1996, 384, 626–630.

[12] Maxworthy T. Experiments on the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight: Part I. Dynamics of the ‘fling’. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1979, 93, 47–63.

[13] Lentink D, Dickinson M H. Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2009, 212, 2705–2719.

[14] Birch J M, Dickson W B, Dickinson M H. Force production and flow structure of the leading edge vortex on flapping wings at high and low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 207, 1063–1072.

[15] Weis-Fogh T. Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1973, 59, 169–230.

[16] Ellington C P. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. III. Kinematics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 1984, 305, 41–78.

[17] Shyy W, Lian Y, Tang J, Viieru D, Liu H. Aerodynamics of Low Reynold Number Flyers, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 2008.

[18] Bomphrey R J, Lawson N J, Harding N J, Taylor G K, Thomas A L R. The aerodynamics of Manduca sexta: Digital particle image velocimetry analysis of the leading-edge vortex. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2005, 208, 1079–1094.

[19] Bomphrey R J. Insects in flight: Direct visualization and flow measurements. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2006, 1, S1–S9.

[20] Dabiri J O. On the estimation of swimming and flying forces from wake measurements. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2005, 208, 3519–3532.

[21] Thomas A L R, Taylor G K, Srygley R B, Nudds R L, Bomphrey R J. Dragonfly flight: Free-flight and tethered flow visualizations reveal a diverse array of unsteady lift-generating mechanisms, controlled primarily via angle of attack. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 207, 4299–4323.

[22] Bomphrey R J, Taylor G K, Thomas A L R. Smoke visualization of free-flying bumblebees indicates independent leading-edge vortices on each wing pair. Experiments in Fluids, 2009, 46, 811–821.

[23] Hongo Y. Appraising behaviour during male-male interaction in the Japanese horned beetle Trypoxylus dichotomus septentrionalis (Kono). Behaviour, 2003, 140, 501–517.

[24] Mountcastle A M, Daniel T L. Vortexlet models of flapping flexible wings show tuning for force production and control. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2010, 5, 045005.

[25] Lentink D, Van Heijst G F, Muijres F T, Van Leeuwen J L. Vortex interactions with flapping wings and fins can be unpredictable. Biology Letters, 2010, 6, 394–397.

[26] Zhao L, Huang Q, Deng X, Sane S P. Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 2010, 7, 485–497.

[27] Ennos A R. The kinematics an daerodynamics of the free flight of some Diptera. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1989, 142, 49–85.

[28] Antonova O A, Brodsky A K, Ivanov V D. Wing beat kinematics of five insect species. Zoologichesky Zhurnal, 1981, 60, 506–518.

[29] Willmott A, Ellington C. The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1997, 200, 2705–2722.

[30] Wootton R J, Newman D J S. Whitefly have the highest contradiction frequencies yet recorded in non-fibrillar flight muscles. Nature, 1979, 280, 402–403.

[31] Brackenbury J. Wing movements in the bush-cricket Tettigonia viridissima and the mantis Ameles spallanziana during natural leaping. Journal of Zoology, 1990, 220, 593–602.

[32] Burton A J, Sandeman D C. The lift provided by the elytra of the rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes boas. South African Journal of Science, 1961, 57, 107–109.

[33] Le T Q, Byun D, Saputra, Ko J H, Park H C, Kim M. Numerical investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of a hovering Coleopteran insect. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2010, 266, 485–495.

[34] Wang Z J, Russell D. Effect of forewing and hindwing interactions on aerodynamic forces and power in hovering dragonfly flight. Physical Review Letters, 2007, 99, 148101.

[35] Lehmann F-O. Wing-wake interaction reduces power consumption in insect tandem wings. Experiments in Fluids, 2009, 46, 765–775.

Quick Search Adv. Search