Study on the Microstructure of Human Articular Cartilage/Bone Interface

Abstract

Abstract:

For improving the theory of gradient microstructure of cartilage/bone interface, human distal femurs were studied. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), histological sections and MicroCT were used to observe, measure and model the microstructure of cartilage/bone interface. The results showed that the cartilage/bone interface is in a hierarchical structure which is composed of four different tissue layers. The interlocking of hyaline cartilage and calcified cartilage and that of calcified cartilage and subchondral bone are in the manner of “protrusion-pore” with average diameter of 17.0 μm and 34.1 μm respectively. In addition, the cancellous bone under the cartilage is also formed by four layer hierarchical structure, and the adjacent layers are connected by bone trabecula in the shape of H, I and Y, forming a complex interwoven network structure. Finally, the simplified structure model of the cartilage/bone interface was proposed according to the natural articular cartilage/bone interface. The simplified model is a 4-layer gradient biomimetic structure, which corresponds to four different tissues of natural cartilage/bone interface. The results of this work would be beneficial to the design of bionic scaffold for the tissue engineering of articular cartilage/bone.

Key words: tissue engineering, knee joint, articular cartilage/bone, interface of cartilage/bone

Yaxiong Liu??Qin Lian??Jiankang He??Jinna Zhao??Zhongmin Jin??Dichen Li?. Study on the Microstructure of Human Articular Cartilage/Bone Interface[J].J4, 2011, 8(3): 251-263.

References

[1] Kheir E, Shaw D. Hyaline articular cartilage. Orthopaedics and Trauma, 2009, 23, 450–455.

[2] Redman S N, Oldfield S F, Archer C W. Current strategies forarticular cartilage repair. Journal of European Cell and Materials, 2005, 9, 23–32.

[3] Jackson D W, Scheer M J, Simon T M. Cartilage substitutes: Overview of basic science and treatment options. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2001, 9, 37–52.

[4] Williams G M, Chan E F, Temple-Wong M M, Bae W C, Masuda K, Bugbee W D, Sah R L. Shape, loading, and motion in the bioengineering design, fabrication, and testing of personalized synovial joints. Journal of Biomechanics, 2010, 43, 156–165.

[5] Firkins P J, Tipper J L, Ingham E, Stone M H, Farrar R, Fisher J. A novel low wearing differential hardness, ceramic-on-metal hip joint prosthesis. Journal of Biomechanics, 2001, 34, 1291–1298.

[6] Pizzoferrato A, Ciapetti G, Stea S, Toni A. Cellular events in the mechanisms of prosthesis loosening. Clinical Materials, 1991, 7, 51–81.

[7] David H. Sochart, Martyn L. Porter. Long-term results of cemented Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in patients aged less than 30 years. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1998, 13, 123–131.

[8] Munirah S, Samsudin O C, Aminuddin B S, Ruszymah B H I. Expansion of human articular chondrocytes and formation of tissue-engineered cartilage: A step towards exploring a potential use of matrix-induced cell therapy. Tissue and Cell, 2010, 42, 282–292.

[9] Schaefer D, Martin I, Shastri P, Padera R F, Langer R, Freed L E, Vunjak-Novakovic G. In vitro generation of osteochondral composites. Biomaterials, 2000, 21, 2599–2606.

[10] Martin I, Miot S, Barbero A, Jakob M, Wendt D. Osteochondral tissue engineering. Journal of Biomechanics, 2007, 40, 750–765.

[11] Grayson W L, Chao P H G, Marolt D, Kaplan D L, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Engineering custom-designed osteochondral tissue grafts. Trends in Biotechnology, 2008, 26, 181–189.

[12] Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 2005, 26, 5474–5491.

[13] Bullough P G, Jagannath A. The morphology of the calcification front in articular cartilage: Its significance in joint function. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-British Volume, 1983, 65, 72–78.

[14] Mollenhauer J A, Burkardt C, Nisch W, Bossert J, Hempel H J, Jandt K D, Muehleman C. Definition of the joint cartilage-bone interface by topological scanning technologies: Considerations for optimized material interfaces in implant technology. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2007, 9, 1097–1103.

[15] Wang F, Liu Y, Duan X. Study at the structure of calcified cartilage of normal knee cartilage. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2008, 22, 524–527. (in Chinese)

[16] Li G, Park S E, DeFrate L E, Schutzer M E, Ji L, Gill T J, Rubash H E. The cartilage thickness distribution in the tibiofemoral joint and its correlation with cartilage-to-cartilage contact. Clinical biomechanics, 2005, 20, 736–744.

[17] Swann A C, Seedhom B B. The stiffness of normal articular cartilage and the predominant acting stress levels: Implications for the aetiology of osteoarthrosis. British Journal of Rheumatology, 1993, 32, 16–25.

[18] Yao J Q, Seedhom B B. Functional adaptation of the thickness of human articualar cartilage. British Journal of Rheumatology, 1993, 32, 956–965.

[19] Hunziker E B, Quinn T M, Hauselmann H J. Quantitative structural organization of normal adult human articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2002, 10, 564–572.

Akizuki S, Mow V C, Muller F. Tensile properties of human knee joint cartilage: I. Influence of ionic conditions, weight bearing, and fibrillation on the tensile modulus. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1986, 4, 379–392.

Quick Search Adv. Search