Developing Skin Analogues for a Robotic Octopus

doi:10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60126-1

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to fabricate a biomimetic skin for an octopus inspired robot, a new process was developed based on mechanical properties measured from real octopus skin. Various knitted nylon textiles were tested and the one of 10-denier nylon was chosen as reinforcement. A combination of Ecoflex 0030 and 0010 silicone rubbers was used as matrix of the composite to obtain the right stiffness for the skin-analogue system. The open mould fabrication process developed allows air bubble to escape easily and the artificial skin produced was thin and waterproof. Material properties of the biomimetic skin were characterised using static tensile and instrumented scissors cutting tests. The Young’s moduli of the artificial skin are 0.08 MPa and 0.13 MPa in the longitudinal and transverse directions, which are much lower than those of the octopus skin. The strength and fracture toughness of the artificial skin, on the other hand are higher than those of real octopus skins. Conically-shaped skin prototypes to be used to cover the robotic arm unit were manufactured and tested. The biomimetic skin prototype was stiff enough to maintain it conical shape when filled with water. The driving force for elongation was reduced significantly compared with previous prototypes.

Key words: biomimetic, skin artefact, octopus, robot, textile composite

Jinping Hou, Richard H. C. Bonser, George Jeronimidis. Developing Skin Analogues for a Robotic Octopus[J].J4, 2012, 9(3): 385-390.

References

[1] Madison K C. Barrier function of the skin: "la raison d'être" of the epidermis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 2003, 121, 231–241.

[2] Proksch E, Brandner J M, Jensen J M. The skin: An indispensable barrier. Experimental Dermatology, 2008, 17, 1063–1072.

[3] Hou J P, Bonser, R H C, Jeronimidis G. Design of a biomimetic skin for an octopus-inspired robot– Part I: Characterising octopus skin. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2011, 8, 288–296.

[4] Octopus project 2nd period report,
http://www.octopusproject.eu/members_area/Members_area/Reports/OCTOPUS_2nd_Periodic_Activity_and_
Management_Report_D1.1+D1.2.pdf.

[5] Hou J P, Bonser R H C, Jeronimidis G. Design of a biomimetic skin for an octopus-inspired robot– Part II: Development of the skin artefact. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2011, 8, 297–304.

[6] Wan Abas W A B, Barbenel J C. Uniaxial tension test of human skin in vivo. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1982, 4, 65–71.

[7] Mansour J M, Davis B R, Srour M, Theberge R. A method for obtaining repeatable measurements of the tensile properties of skin at low strain. Journal of Biomechanics, 1993, 26, 211–216.

[8] Fiford R J, Bilston L E. The mechanical properties of rat spinal cord in vitro. Journal of Biomechanics, 2005, 38, 1509–1515.

[9] Rincón L, Schatzmann L, Brunner P, Stäubli H. U, Ferguson S J, Oxland T R, Nolte L P. Design and evaluation of a cryogenic soft tissue fixation device — load tolerances and thermal aspects. Journal of Biomechanics, 2001, 34, 393–397.

[10] Sokolis D P, Kefaloyannis E M, Kouloukoussa M, Marinos E, Boudoulas H, Karayannacos P E. A structural basis for the aortic stress–strain relation in uniaxial tension. Journal of Biomechanics, 2006, 39, 1651–1662.

[11] Shergold O A, Fleck N A., Radford D. The uniaxial stress versus strain response of pig skin and silicone rubber at low and high strain rates. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2006, 32, 1384–1402.

[12] Darvell B W, Lee P K D, Yuen T D B, Lucas P W. A portable fracture toughness tester for biological materials. Measurement Science and Technology, 1996, 7, 954–962.

[13] Lucas P W, Pereira B. Estimation of fracture toughness of leaves. Functional Ecology, 1990, 4, 819–822.

[14] Choong M F, Lucas P W, Ong J S Y, Pereira B, Tan T W, Turner I M. Leaf fracture toughness and sclerophylly-their correlations and ecological implications. New Phytologist, 1992, 121, 597–610.

[15] Vincent J F V. Fracture, in Biomechanics Materials-A Practical Approach, IRL Press, Oxford, UK, 1992.

[16] Pereira B P, Lucas P W, Swee-Hin T. Ranking the fracture toughness of thin mammalian soft tissues using the scissors cutting test. Journal of Biomechanics, 1997, 31, 91–94

Quick Search Adv. Search