Multiscale Mechanics and Optimization of Gastropod Shells

doi:10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60041-3

Abstract

Abstract:

A vast majority of mollusks grow a hard shell for protection. The structure of these shells comprises several levels of hierarchy that increase their strength and their resistance to natural threats. This article focuses on nacreous shells, which are composed of two distinct layers. The outer layer is made of calcite, which is a hard but brittle material, and the inner layer is made of nacre, a tough and ductile material. The inner and outer layers are therefore made of materials with distinct structures and properties. In this article, we demonstrate that this system is optimum to defeat attacks from predators. A two-scale modeling and optimization approach was used. At the macroscale, a two-layer finite element model of a seashell was developed to capture shell geometry. At the microscale, a representative volume element of the microstructure of nacre was used to model the elastic modulus of nacre as well as a multiaxial failure criterion, both expressed as function of microstructural parameters. Experiments were also performed on actual shells of red abalone to validate the results obtained from simulations and gain insight into the way the shell fails under sharp perforation. Both optimization and experimental results revealed that the shell displays optimum performance when two modes of failure coincide within the structure. Finally, guidelines for designing two-layer shells were proposed to improve the performance of engineered protective systems undergoing similar structural and loading conditions.

Key words: seashell, multiscale modeling, representative volume element, failure criterion, nacre, multiscale optimization

Mostafa Yourdkhani, Damiano Pasini, Francois Barthelat. Multiscale Mechanics and Optimization of Gastropod Shells[J].J4, 2011, 8(4): 357-368.

References

[1] Barthelat F. Biomimetics for next generation materials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2007, 365, 2907–2919.

[2] Barthelat F, Tang H, Zavattieri P D, Li C M, Espinosa H D. On the mechanics of mother-of-pearl: A key feature in the material hierarchical structure. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2007, 55, 306–337.

[3] Meyers M A, Lin A Y M, Chen P Y, Muyco J. Mechanical strength of abalone nacre: Role of the soft organic layer. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2008, 1, 76–85.

[4] Sarikaya M, Aksay I A. Biomimetics: Design and Processing of Materials (AIP Series in Polymers and Complex Materials), American Institute of Physics, New York, USA, 1995.

[5] Wang C H, Zhang L C, Mai Y W. Deformation and fracture of macadamia nuts. I. Deformation analysis of nut-in-shell. International Journal of Fracture, 1994, 69, 51–65.

[6] Fischer-Cripps A C. Introduction to Contact Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, USA, 2007.

[7] Caspi E N, Pokroy B, Lee P L, Quintana J P, Zolotoyabko E. On the structure of aragonite. Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, 2005, 61, 129–132.

[8] Rabiei R, Bekah S, Barthelat F. Failure mode transition in nacre and bone-like materials. Acta Biomaterialia, 2010, 6, 4081–4089.

[9] Kotha S P, Li Y, Guzelsu N. Micromechanical model of nacre tested in tension. Journal of Materials Science, 2001, 36, 2001–2007.

[10] Wang R Z, Suo Z, Evans A G, Yao N, Aksay I A. Deformation mechanisms in nacre. Journal of Materials Research, 2001, 16, 2485–2493.

[11] Currey J D. Mechanical properties of mother of pearl in tension. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 1977, 196, 443–463.

[12] Jager I, Fratzl P. Mineralized collagen fibrils: A mechanical model with a staggered arrangement of mineral particles. Biophysical Journal, 2000, 79, 1737–1746.

[13] Aboudi J. Mechanics of Composite Materials: A Unified Micromechanical Approach, Elsevier, New York, USA, 1991.

[14] Jackson A P, Vincent J F V, Turner R M. The mechanical design of nacre. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 1988, 234, 415–440.

[15] Barthelat F, Li C M, Comi C, Espinosa H D. Mechanical properties of nacre constituents and their impact on mechanical performance. Journal of Materials Research, 2006, 21, 1977–1986.

[16] Barthelat F, Espinosa H D. An experimental investigation of deformation and fracture of nacre-mother of pearl. Experimental Mechanics, 2007, 47, 311–324.

[17] Courtney T H. Mechanical Behavior of Materials, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1990.

[18] Fitoussi J, Guo G, Baptiste D. Determination of a tridimensional failure criterion at the fibre/matrix
interface of an organic-matrix/discontinuous-reinforcement composite. Composites Science and Technology, 1996, 56, 755–760.

[19] Stamblewski C, Sankar B V, Zenkert D. Analysis of three-dimensional quadratic failure criteria for thick composites using the direct micromechanics method. Journal of Composite Materials, 2008, 42, 635–654.

[20] Menig R, Meyers M H, Meyers M A, Vecchio K S. Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical response of Haliotis rufescens (abalone) shells. Acta Materialia, 2000, 48, 2383–2398.

[21] Lawn B, Bhowmick S, Bush M B, Qasim T, Rekow E D, Zhang Y. Failure modes in ceramic-based layer structures: A basis for materials design of dental crowns. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2007, 90, 1671–1683.

[22] Nelder J A, Mead R. A simplex-method for function minimization. Computer Journal, 1965, 7, 308–313.

[23] Weaver P M, Ashby M F. Material limits for shape efficiency. Progress in Materials Science, 1997, 41, 61–128.

Quick Search Adv. Search