Quick Search Adv. Search

Journal of Bionic Engineering ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4): 746-756.doi: 10.1007/s42235-020-0060-1

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Spinal Motion Segments – I: Concept for a Subject-specific Analogue Model

Constantinos Franceskides1, Emily Arnold1, Ian Horsfall2, Gianluca Tozzi3, Michael C. Gibson4, Peter Zioupos1*   

  1. 1. Musculoskeletal and Medicolegal Research Group, Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, 
    Defence Academy of the UK, Shrivenham, SN6 8LA, UK 
    2. Impact and Armour Group, Centre for Defence Engineering, Cranfield University, 
    Defence Academy of the UK, Shrivenham, SN6 8LA, UK 
    3. School of Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3DJ, UK 
    4. Centre for Simulation & Analytics, Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the UK, Shrivenham, SN6 8LA, UK

  • Received:2018-09-12 Revised:2020-03-06 Accepted:2020-04-13 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-07
  • Contact: Peter Zioupos E-mail:p.zioupos@hotmail.co.uk
  • About author:Constantinos Franceskides1, Emily Arnold1, Ian Horsfall2, Gianluca Tozzi3, Michael C. Gibson4, Peter Zioupos1*

Abstract: Most commercial spine analogues are not intended for biomechanical testing, and those developed for this purpose are expensive and yet still fail to replicate the mechanical performance of biological specimens. Patient-specific analogues that address these limitations and avoid the ethical restrictions surrounding the use of human cadavers are therefore required. We present a method for the production and characterisation of biofidelic, patient-specific, Spine Motion Segment (SMS = 2 vertebrae and the disk in between) analogues that allow for the biological variability encountered when dealing with real patients. Porcine spine segments (L1–L4) were scanned by computed tomography, and 3D models were printed in acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). Four biological specimens and four ABS motion segments were tested, three of which were further segmented into two Vertebral Bodies (VBs) with their intervertebral disc (IVD). All segments were loaded axially at 0.6 mm?min?1 (strain-rate range 6×10?4 s?1 – 10×10?4 s?1). The artificial VBs behaved like biological segments within the elastic region, but the best two-part artificial IVD were ~15% less stiff than the biological IVDs. High-speed images recorded during compressive loading allowed full-field strains to be produced. During compression of the spine motion segments, IVDs experienced higher strains than VBs as expected. Our method allows the rapid, inexpensive and reliable production of patient-specific 3D-printed analogues, which morphologically resemble the real ones, and whose mechanical behaviour is comparable to real biological spine motion segments and this is their biggest asset.

Key words: spine, bone analogue, micro-CT, 3D printing, Digital Image Correlation (DIC)