Kinematic Analysis of the Neck and Upper Extremities During Walking in Healthy Young Adults

doi:10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60025-5

Abstract

Abstract:

The objective of this paper is to quantify the local stabilities of the neck and upper extremities (right/left shoulders and right/left elbows), and investigate differences between linear and nonlinear measurements of the associated joint motions and differences in the local stability between the upper and lower extremities. This attempt involves the calculation of a nonlinear parameter, Lyapunov Exponent (LE), and a linear parameter, Range of Motion (ROM), during treadmill walking in conjunction with a large population of healthy subjects. Joint motions of subjects were captured using a three-dimensional motion-capture system. Then mathematical chaos theory and the Rosenstein algorithm were employed to calculate LE of joints as the extent of logarithmic divergence between the neighboring state-space trajectories of flexion-extension angles. LEs computed over twenty males and twenty females were 0.037±0.023 for the neck, 0.043±0.021 for the right shoulder, 0.045±0.030 for the left shoulder, 0.032±0.021 for the right elbow, and 0.034±0.026 for the left elbow. Although statistically significant difference in the ROM was observed between all pairs of the neck and upper extremity joints, differences in the LE between all pairs of the joints as well as between males and females were not statistically significant. Between the upper and lower extremities, LEs of the neck, shoulder, and elbow were significantly smaller than those of the hip (~0.064) and the knee (~0.062). These results indicate that a statistical difference in the local stability between the upper extremity joints is not significant. However, the different result between the ROM and LE gives a strong rationale for applying both linear and nonlinear tools together to the evaluation of joint movement. The LEs of the joints calculated from a large population of healthy subjects could provide normative values for the associated joints and can be used to evaluate the recovery progress of patients with joint related diseases.

Key words: kinematic analysis, Lyapunov exponent, range of motion, chaos theory, upper extremities

Kwon Son??Junghong Park??Seonghun Park?. Kinematic Analysis of the Neck and Upper Extremities During Walking in Healthy Young Adults[J].J4, 2011, 8(3): 305-312.

References

[1] Whiting W C, Gregor R J, Finerman G A. Kinematic analysis of human upper extremity movements in boxing. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1988, 16, 130–136.

[2] Alexander M J, Haddow J B. A kinematic analysis of an upper extremity ballistic skill: The windmill pitch. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 1982, 7, 209–217.

[3] Allen J R, O'Keefe K B, McCue T J, Borger J J, Hahn M E. Upper extremity kinematic trends of fly-casting: Establishing the effects of line length. Sports Biomechanics, 2008, 7, 38–53.

[4] House J H, Gwathmey F W, Fidler M O. A dynamic approach to the thumb-in palm deformity in cerebral palsy. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume), 1981, 63, 216–225.

[5] Koman L A, Williams R M M, Evans P J, Richardson R, Naughton M J, Passmore L, Smith B P. Quantification of upper extremity function and range of motion in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2008, 50, 910–917.

[6] Ford M P, Wagenaar R C, Newell K M. Arm constraint and walking in healthy adults. Gait Posture, 2007, 26, 135–141.

[7] Ramos E, Latash M P, Hurvitz E A, Brown S H. Quantification of upper extremity function using kinematic analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 1997, 78, 491–496.

[8] Hingtgen B, McGuire J R, Wang M, Harris G F. An upper extremity kinematic model for evaluation of hemiparetic stroke. Journal of Biomechanics, 2006, 39, 681–688.

[9] Mosqueda T, James M A, Petuskey K, Bagley A, Abdala E, Rab G. Kinematic assessment of the upper extremity in brachial plexus birth palsy. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2004, 24, 695–699.

[10] Rosenstein M T, Collins J J, De Luca C J. A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 1993, 65, 117–134.

[11] Kantz H, Schreiber S. Nonlinear Time Series Analysis, 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.

[12] Dingwell J B, Cusumano J P. Nonlinear time series analysis of normal and pathological human walking. Chaos, 2000, 10, 848–863.

[13] Matjaz P. The dynamics of human gait. European Journal of Physics, 2005, 26, 525–534.

[14] Dingwell J B, Cusumano J P, Sternad D, Cavanagh P R. Slower speeds in patients with diabetic neuropathy lead to improved local dynamic stability of continuous overground walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 2000, 33, 1269–1277.

[15] Dingwell J B, Marin L C. Kinematic variability and local dynamic stability of upper body motions when walking at different speeds. Journal of Biomechanics, 2006, 39, 444–452.

[16] Harbourne R T, Stergiou N. Nonlinear analysis of the development of sitting postural control. Developmental Psychobiology, 2003, 42, 368–377.

[17] Stergiou N, Harbourne R, Cavanaugh J. Optimal movement variability: A new theoretical perspective for neurologic physical therapy. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 2006, 30, 120–129.

[18] Ko J H, Son K, Moon B Y, Suh J T. Gait study on the normal and ACL deficient patients after ligament reconstruction surgery using chaos analysis method. Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A, 2006, 30, 435–441.

[19] Stergiou N, Moraiti C, Giakas G, Ristanis S, Georgoulis A D. The effect of the walking speed on the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Clinical Biomechanics, 2004, 19, 957–963.

[20] Rapp P E. A guide to dynamical analysis. Integrative physiological and behavioral science, 1994, 29, 311–327.

[21] Son K, Park J, Park S. Variability analysis of lower extremity joint kinematics during walking in healthy young adults. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2009, 31, 784–792.

[22] Schreiber T, Schmitz A. Surrogate time series. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 2000, 142, 346–382.

[23] Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B, Doyne F J. Testing for nonlinearity in time series: The method of surrogate data. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 1992, 58, 77–94.

[24] Fraser A M, Swinney H L. Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Physical Review A, 1986, 33, 1134–1140.

[25] Takens F. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1981, 898, 366–381.

[26] Kennel M B, Brown R, Abarbanel H D. Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Physical Review A, 1992, 45, 3403–3411.

[27] Dingwell J B, Cavanagh P R. Increased variability of continuous overground walking in neuropathic patients is only indirectly related to sensory loss. Gait Posture, 2001, 14, 1–10.

[28] Sato S, Sano M, Sawada Y. Practical methods of measuring the generalized dimension and the largest Lyapunov exponent in high dimensional chaotic systems. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 1987, 77, 1–5.

[29] Moretto P, Bisiaux M, Lafortune M A. Froude number fractions to increase walking pattern dynamic similarities: Application to plantar pressure study in healthy subjects. Gait Posture, 2007, 25, 40–48.

Li C, Xia X. On the bound of the Lyapunov exponents for continuous systems. Chaos, 2004, 14, 557–561.

Quick Search Adv. Search